kanotix.com
General Support - Install 2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 without simbolic links
op4latino - 24.08.2006, 23:17 Uhr
Titel: Install 2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 without simbolic links
Is there a reason why when I run install-kernel-kanotix.sh the simbolic links weren't created? I had to manually create them with
Code:
cd /boot
ln -s initrd.img-2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 initrd.img
ln -s vmlinuz-2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 vmlinuz
markb - 24.08.2006, 23:48 Uhr
Titel: RE: Install 2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 without simbolic links
And related to this - what is the difference between kernel-2.6.17.11-kanotix-2.zip and kernel-2.6.17.11-slh-up-1.zip which are both listed as "Stable Kernels". Which one is advised to use?
Crust - 25.08.2006, 00:24 Uhr
Titel: RE: Install 2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 without simbolic links
up stands for uniprocessor.
the kanotix kernel is an smp-enabled kernel.
-Crust
Kano - 25.08.2006, 00:42 Uhr
Titel: RE: Install 2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 without simbolic links
I removed those symlinks. They are usally not needed. Just a little cleanup.
hubi - 25.08.2006, 02:08 Uhr
Titel: RE: Install 2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 without simbolic links
I like that cleanup. No double listing of kernels in grub is fine.
hubi
markb - 25.08.2006, 06:04 Uhr
Titel: Re: RE: Install 2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 without simbolic links
Crust hat folgendes geschrieben::
up stands for uniprocessor.
the kanotix kernel is an smp-enabled kernel.
So which one is the recommended latest stable kernel for a up machine?
Crust - 25.08.2006, 22:56 Uhr
Titel: RE: Re: RE: Install 2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 without simbolic lin
I use the up one because the smp ones have bugs on all of my Athlon 64 processors (running in 32 bit mode).
I would suggest the up kernel.
-Crust
Kano - 26.08.2006, 00:43 Uhr
Titel: RE: Re: RE: Install 2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 without simbolic lin
I don't see your issues.
markb - 26.08.2006, 01:01 Uhr
Titel: Re: RE: Re: RE: Install 2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 without simbolic
Crust hat folgendes geschrieben::
I use the up one because the smp ones have bugs on all of my Athlon 64 processors (running in 32 bit mode).
I would suggest the up kernel.
But given that kernel-2.6.17.11-kanotix-2.zip seems to be the "official" kernel release by Kano, and does not bother to state "smp" in it's title so that must not be a significant fact, then should it be the kernel chosen by somebody who just wants to follow the official kanotix release? I only have a up pentium 4 but I note that the kernel on the 2006-RC4 live CD is SMP enabled. Seems that is the preferred one?
Alle Zeiten sind GMT + 1 Stunde
PNphpBB2 © 2003-2007