| Autor | Nachricht | 
  
    |  | 
        
					| Titel: kernel update  Verfasst am: 04.08.2006, 15:23 Uhr |  | 
  
    | 
        
          | 
 
 Anmeldung: 23. Feb 2006
 Beiträge: 33
 
 
 |  | 
        
          | Excuse me  I'm a newbe What difference between xxxx-slh-up  and xxxxxx-slh-smp ?
 thanks
 |  
          |  |  
         
	        |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
        
					| Titel: kernel update  Verfasst am: 04.08.2006, 15:38 Uhr |  | 
  
    | 
        
          | 
  
 Anmeldung: 23. Sep 2004
 Beiträge: 618
 
 
 |  | 
        
          | up = uniprocessor smp = symetric multiprocessor
 |  
          | _________________
 Ich bin nicht die Signatur, ich Putz' hier nur
   Nach Diktat spazieren gegangen
   
   |  
         
	        |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
        
					| Titel: kernel update  Verfasst am: 04.08.2006, 15:41 Uhr |  | 
  
    | 
        
          | 
 
 Anmeldung: 23. Feb 2006
 Beiträge: 33
 
 
 |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
        
					| Titel: RE: kernel update  Verfasst am: 04.08.2006, 18:06 Uhr |  | 
  
    | 
        
          | 
 
 Anmeldung: 21. Jan 2005
 Beiträge: 454
 Wohnort: NYC/NJ Area
 
 |  | 
        
          | Wait...where are the kanotix kernels.I only see SLH kernels. Also where are the older ones located again?
 I am useing 2.6.17-kanotix-1 and would like to update.
 
 
 Also,I know its been mentioned but whats the difference's in the slh vs kanotix kernels?
 |  
          |  |  
         
	        |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
        
					| Titel: RE: kernel update  Verfasst am: 04.08.2006, 18:32 Uhr |  | 
  
    | 
        
          | 
  
 Anmeldung: 23. Sep 2004
 Beiträge: 618
 
 
 |  | 
        
          | Zitat: 
but whats the difference's in the slh vs kanotix kernels?
 You can use the slh-kernel to.
 |  
          | _________________
 Ich bin nicht die Signatur, ich Putz' hier nur
   Nach Diktat spazieren gegangen
   
   |  
         
	        |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
        
					| Titel: RE: kernel update  Verfasst am: 04.08.2006, 18:36 Uhr |  | 
  
    | 
        
          | Team Member 
  
  
 Anmeldung: 06. Mai 2005
 Beiträge: 3087
 Wohnort: berlin
 
 |  | 
        
          | ironwalker, kano's latest kernels were all smp-kernels. right now slh builds both, up & smp for 32 & 64 bit.
 you can use them in the same way as kano kernels before, i never had a single issue with them.
 
 greetz
 devil
 |  
          | _________________
 <<We are  Xorg - resistance is futile - you will be axximilated>>
 
 Host/Kernel/OS  "devilsbox" running[2.6.19-rc1-git5-kanotix-1KANOTIX-2006-01-RC4 ]
 CPU Info        AMD Athlon 64 3000+ clocked at [ 803.744 MHz ]
 |  
         
	        |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
        
					| Titel:  Verfasst am: 04.08.2006, 19:56 Uhr |  | 
  
    | 
        
          | 
 
 Anmeldung: 30. Nov 2005
 Beiträge: 91
 
 
 |  | 
        
          | I can agree with devil. 
 My last 2 (at least) kernel upgrades have all been
 slh's and I've never had a problem. I use Kano's
 Kanotix-Update-GUI for my kernel updates. It's
 neat and even does the re-installation of the NVidia
 drivers. Excellent!
 |  
          |  |  
         
	        |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
        
					| Titel:  Verfasst am: 04.08.2006, 21:38 Uhr |  | 
  
    | 
        
          | 
 
 Anmeldung: 08. Dez 2005
 Beiträge: 300
 
 
 |  | 
        
          | I had nary an issue with slh's kernels and are comfortable using them myself |  
          |  |  
         
	        |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
        
					| Titel:  Verfasst am: 05.08.2006, 00:09 Uhr |  | 
  
    | 
        
          | 
  
 Anmeldung: 16. Apr 2006
 Beiträge: 207
 Wohnort: England
 
 |  | 
        
          | What does slh actually mean? |  
          | _________________
 sidux 32 & 64 | PCLinuxOS | PC-BSD
 repository of shame - compiz fusion & beryl repo for debian Sid/Lenny/Etch | 32-bit | 64-bit
 |  
         
	        |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
        
					| Titel:  Verfasst am: 05.08.2006, 01:46 Uhr |  | 
  
    | 
        
          | 
  
 Anmeldung: 08. Apr 2006
 Beiträge: 9
 Wohnort: Orlando, FL
 
 |  | 
        
          | If you search the memberlist, I am sure you will locate slh. |  
          | _________________
 Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the president. - Theodore Roosevelt
 |  
         
	        |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
        
					| Titel:  Verfasst am: 05.08.2006, 02:03 Uhr |  | 
  
    | 
        
          | 
  
 Anmeldung: 16. Apr 2006
 Beiträge: 207
 Wohnort: England
 
 |  | 
        
          | Ah, I see now |  
          | _________________
 sidux 32 & 64 | PCLinuxOS | PC-BSD
 repository of shame - compiz fusion & beryl repo for debian Sid/Lenny/Etch | 32-bit | 64-bit
 |  
         
	        |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
        
					| Titel:  Verfasst am: 05.08.2006, 02:05 Uhr |  | 
  
    | 
        
          | Team Member 
  
  
 Anmeldung: 03. Mai 2005
 Beiträge: 1544
 Wohnort: out there somewhere
 
 |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
        
					| Titel:  Verfasst am: 05.08.2006, 05:24 Uhr |  | 
  
    | 
        
          | 
  
 Anmeldung: 18. Jul 2005
 Beiträge: 293
 Wohnort: EST US
 
 |  | 
        
          | The only difference that I could find with kano's and slh's kernel is that slh doesn't include bootsplash functionality in his kernels. 
 So if you like bootsplash over splashy, you'll miss it. However, having a updated kernel (security, new features, etc) is worth the lost of bootsplash.
 |  
          |  |  
         
	        |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
        
					| Titel:  Verfasst am: 05.08.2006, 05:37 Uhr |  | 
  
    | 
        
          | Team Member 
  
  
 Anmeldung: 03. Mai 2005
 Beiträge: 1544
 Wohnort: out there somewhere
 
 |  | 
        
          | op4latino hat folgendes geschrieben:: 
The only difference that I could find with kano's and slh's kernel is that slh doesn't include bootsplash functionality in his kernels. 
 So if you like bootsplash over splashy, you'll miss it. However, having a updated kernel (security, new features, etc) is worth the lost of bootsplash.
 
 hehe, I just found that out
  |  
          | _________________
 h2's d-u script
 h2's rdiff-backup script
 |  
         
	        |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
        
					| Titel:  Verfasst am: 05.08.2006, 06:26 Uhr |  | 
  
    | 
        
          | 
 
 Anmeldung: 23. Feb 2006
 Beiträge: 33
 
 
 |  | 
        
          | I have installed, for mistake, smp kernel and now I woul dile remove it
 
 in konsole as root:
 dpkg --purge --force-remove-essential kernel-image-2.6.17.7-slh-smp-1
 
 but:
 dpkg - warning: ignoring request to remove kernel-image-2.6.17.7-slh-smp-1 which isn't installed.
 
 Why?
 |  
          |  |  
         
	        |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
        
					| Titel:  Verfasst am: 05.08.2006, 06:31 Uhr |  | 
  
    | 
        
          | Team Member 
  
  
 Anmeldung: 03. Mai 2005
 Beiträge: 1544
 Wohnort: out there somewhere
 
 |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
        
					| Titel:  Verfasst am: 05.08.2006, 09:15 Uhr |  | 
  
    | 
        
          | 
 
 Anmeldung: 12. Mar 2005
 Beiträge: 1005
 
 
 |  | 
        
          | Script now features option to install either slh's latest rc stuff or the last stable release, non rc labeled. RC means release candidate, not a final release. Please read the page piper linked to before downloading the script and running it. 
 Also, for others reading this, please wait a decent amount of time before removing older kernels, sometimes something doesn't work and you don't notice it right away. You can download some, but not all, older kernels in my script. If anyone has the 2.6.16.20 slh 32 and 64 bit kernels sticky me, I'd like to put those up for people who might need the latest 2.6.16 because something isn't working in 2.6.17 series.
 |  
          | _________________
 Read more on dist-upgrades using du-fixes-h2.sh script.
 New: rdiff-backup script
 |  
         
	        |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
        
					| Titel:  Verfasst am: 07.08.2006, 19:20 Uhr |  | 
  
    | 
        
          | 
 
 Anmeldung: 21. Jan 2005
 Beiträge: 454
 Wohnort: NYC/NJ Area
 
 |  | 
        
          | op4latino hat folgendes geschrieben:: 
The only difference that I could find with kano's and slh's kernel is that slh doesn't include bootsplash functionality in his kernels. 
 So if you like bootsplash over splashy, you'll miss it. However, having a updated kernel (security, new features, etc) is worth the lost of bootsplash.
 
 Thank you.
 I am assumeing mdadm and raid works.
 I will update,if I need to edit anything that isnt a problem either....if I remember,its been awhile.
 
 Anyone have the link to the old thread on editing the kernel to remove or add what you want...couldn't find it on search?
 Maybe a small,to the point tutorial.For the most part,I remember but not sure if anything in the standard routine changed.
 |  
          |  |  
         
	        |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
        
					| Titel:  Verfasst am: 07.08.2006, 19:33 Uhr |  | 
  
    | 
        
          | 
 
 Anmeldung: 21. Apr 2006
 Beiträge: 152
 Wohnort: Ice and Snow
 
 |  | 
        
          | My advice. Always use Kanotix-update-gui. You never have to worry about removing present kernals, and if you don't like it, you can always go back to an older kernal (forget which file it is at the moment). The only time I had a prob was when a KDE update was buggy. Add this to your source.list and you never will regret it. # Kanotix-Update-GUI Loibls Scripte
 #gpg key apt-get install acritox-archive-keyring
 deb http://www.andreas-loibl.de/linux/debian/ ./
 deb-src http://www.andreas-loibl.de/linux/debian ./
 |  
          |  |  
         
	        |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
        
					| Titel:  Verfasst am: 07.08.2006, 20:21 Uhr |  | 
  
    | 
        
          | Team Member 
  
  
 Anmeldung: 03. Mai 2005
 Beiträge: 1544
 Wohnort: out there somewhere
 
 |  | 
        
          | My fault actually, with  h2's script You Don't Have to Remove Old Kernel and is advised to keep the old one for awhile to make sure everything works ok. I was posting the way I do things which is not good practice for most, and is my mistake  |  
          | _________________
 h2's d-u script
 h2's rdiff-backup script
 |  
         
	        |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
  
    |  |