| Autor |
Nachricht |
|
|
Titel: flgrx radian driver updated flgrxinfo errors (SOLVED)
 Verfasst am: 05.08.2006, 05:37 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 06. Jun 2005
Beiträge: 77
Wohnort: Sydney Australia
|
|
I needed the 3D for Google Earth which is awesome on the linux platform. I got the driver working (seems to be ) using Kano's scripts but fglrxinfo gives errors like the following but a whole lot more .
cliff@box:~/Desktop/$ fglrxinfo
[fglrx] API ERROR: could not register entrypoint for SelectTextureSGIS
[fglrx] API ERROR: could not register entrypoint for SelectTextureTransformSGIS
[fglrx] API ERROR: could not register entrypoint for ClientActiveVertexStreamATI
[fglrx] API ERROR: could not register entrypoint for VertexBlendEnviATI
[fglrx] API ERROR: could not register entrypoint for VertexBlendEnvfATI
[fglrx] API ERROR: could not register entrypoint for VertexStream2sATI
[fglrx] API ERROR: could not register entrypoint for VertexStream2svATI |
Zuletzt bearbeitet von cliff99 am 20.08.2006, 03:16 Uhr, insgesamt ein Mal bearbeitet
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Titel: RE: After flgrx radian driver updated flgrxinfo gives errors
Verfasst am: 05.08.2006, 06:27 Uhr
|
|
Team Member
Anmeldung: 03. Mai 2005
Beiträge: 1544
Wohnort: out there somewhere
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: RE: After flgrx radian driver updated flgrxinfo gives errors
Verfasst am: 05.08.2006, 06:34 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 06. Jun 2005
Beiträge: 77
Wohnort: Sydney Australia
|
|
| I am using a Dell Laptop with Radion 9700 Mobility chipset. The fglrxinfo used to work with earlier drivers. It appears the drivers are working as the 3d part in GoogleEarth is working ? |
_________________
Location: Sydney Australia
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: RE: After flgrx radian driver updated flgrxinfo gives errors
Verfasst am: 05.08.2006, 12:55 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 17. Dez 2003
Beiträge: 16792
|
|
| Usually you only get those errors with R200 based cards. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: RE: After flgrx radian driver updated flgrxinfo gives errors
Verfasst am: 20.08.2006, 03:17 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 06. Jun 2005
Beiträge: 77
Wohnort: Sydney Australia
|
|
| Fixed by installing ati-driver-installer-8.28.8.run from ATI site ! |
_________________
Location: Sydney Australia
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: RE: After flgrx radian driver updated flgrxinfo gives errors
Verfasst am: 20.08.2006, 03:28 Uhr
|
|
Team Member
Anmeldung: 03. Mai 2005
Beiträge: 1544
Wohnort: out there somewhere
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: RE: After flgrx radian driver updated flgrxinfo gives errors
Verfasst am: 20.08.2006, 04:13 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 06. Jun 2005
Beiträge: 77
Wohnort: Sydney Australia
|
|
| I tried it using the Kanotix GUI installer but still ran Mesa drivers. Probably should have tried the scripts in the console. |
_________________
Location: Sydney Australia
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: RE: After flgrx radian driver updated flgrxinfo gives errors
Verfasst am: 20.08.2006, 05:16 Uhr
|
|
Team Member
Anmeldung: 03. Mai 2005
Beiträge: 1544
Wohnort: out there somewhere
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 03.10.2006, 16:11 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 03. Okt 2006
Beiträge: 8
Wohnort: Buchanan,MI
|
|
Hello..... I have had nothing but trouble getting any kind of fps out of 3d open gl games. I like playing Enemy Territory, but the fps is horrible.... if you get 10 I am doing good.... I will post some info screens.
Host/Kernel/OS "KanotixBox" running Linux 2.6.18-slh-up-2 i686 [ KANOTIX 2006-01 ]
CPU Info Intel Celeron 128 KB cache flags( - ) clocked at [ 2691.425 MHz ]
Videocard Intel 82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE Chipset Integrated Graphics Device X.Org 7.1.0 [ 1024x768 @85hz ]
ATI RV280 [Radeon 9200 SE]
Network cards Realtek RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+, at port: 2000
Processes 77 | Uptime 22:18 | Memory 1188.05/1263.02MB | HDD WDC WD1600JB-00GVA0 Size 160GB (2%used) | GLX Renderer RADEON 9250/9200 Series DDR Generic | GLX Version 1.3.1091 (X4.3.0-8.28. | Client Shell | Infobash v2.50rc21
buchananchris@KanotixBox:~$ fglrxinfo
display: :0.0 screen: 0
OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc.
OpenGL renderer string: RADEON 9250/9200 Series DDR Generic
OpenGL version string: 1.3.1091 (X4.3.0-8.28.
Can anyone help? Thanks |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 03.10.2006, 16:44 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 25. Mar 2005
Beiträge: 2133
|
|
| This is a strange graphics setup because you seem to have to adapters in the system, Intel onboard graphics and ATI Radeon. The onboard graphics should be deactivated when another graphics adapter is present in the AGP slot. |
_________________
And I ain't got no worries 'cause I ain't in no hurry at all (Doobie Brothers, "Black Water").
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 03.10.2006, 18:22 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 03. Okt 2006
Beiträge: 8
Wohnort: Buchanan,MI
|
|
|
ockham23 hat folgendes geschrieben::
This is a strange graphics setup because you seem to have to adapters in the system, Intel onboard graphics and ATI Radeon. The onboard graphics should be deactivated when another graphics adapter is present in the AGP slot.
Yes I have a very strange setup....my Radeon card is PCI not AGP...... I have the onboard cared disabled in bios..... I dont understand why it is seeing it.....But everything according to glxinfo, and fglrxinfo says it is working..... but very very slow. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 03.10.2006, 18:28 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 25. Mar 2005
Beiträge: 2133
|
|
| I suspect that xorg is using the wrong driver; try this to find out:
Code:
cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf | grep -i driver
|
_________________
And I ain't got no worries 'cause I ain't in no hurry at all (Doobie Brothers, "Black Water").
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 03.10.2006, 19:00 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 02. Nov 2005
Beiträge: 127
|
|
CaneMstr: u have the exact same set up as me actually. Although both dont show up detected here....
edit: to be honest i wouldnt try installing latest ati drivers- use some older ones- i cant remember what exact version- i gave up using ati drivers a while ago- there not much use. |
_________________
Linux user 403389 and Herbaholic Trichopath
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 03.10.2006, 21:24 Uhr
|
|
Team Member
Anmeldung: 03. Mai 2005
Beiträge: 1544
Wohnort: out there somewhere
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 04.10.2006, 06:27 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 03. Okt 2006
Beiträge: 8
Wohnort: Buchanan,MI
|
|
|
ockham23 hat folgendes geschrieben::
I suspect that xorg is using the wrong driver; try this to find out:
Code:
cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf | grep -i driver
Well I dont know.... but here is what it says...
Driver "kbd"
Driver "mouse"
Driver "mouse"
Driver "mouse"
Driver "synaptics"
Driver "synaptics"
### Available Driver options are:-
Driver "fglrx" |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 04.10.2006, 06:28 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 03. Okt 2006
Beiträge: 8
Wohnort: Buchanan,MI
|
|
|
wegface hat folgendes geschrieben::
CaneMstr: u have the exact same set up as me actually. Although both dont show up detected here....
edit: to be honest i wouldnt try installing latest ati drivers- use some older ones- i cant remember what exact version- i gave up using ati drivers a while ago- there not much use.
Hmmmmmm...... not sure what I am going to do now.... but this fps is just unacceptable. Did you get any good fps with ati at all? and I have found no easy to find the older drivers. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 04.10.2006, 06:30 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 03. Okt 2006
Beiträge: 8
Wohnort: Buchanan,MI
|
|
|
piper hat folgendes geschrieben::
To be honest, I think your "bad" FPS rate is due to this
Intel Celeron 128
Not the videocard
You know, you might be right...... I have an older one around here, my pop that in, and see if there is any changes.... Thanks for the information. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 04.10.2006, 08:02 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 02. Nov 2005
Beiträge: 127
|
|
If u edit Kano's fglrx script you can make it download the drivers of your choice by commenting one line, and uncommenting another. Have a look - you'll figure it out.
Piper yes, as i am cursed with said cpu as well- and yep its crap. But the graphics card certainly doesnt help matters being as its an ancient rv280 on a pci slot. Pci slots, celerons with silly cache sizes, and ati bullshit isnt the way to decent fps. hehe.
Unfortunalty the inbuilt intel graphics chip sucks even worse.
New pc please! |
_________________
Linux user 403389 and Herbaholic Trichopath
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 04.10.2006, 08:07 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 25. Mar 2005
Beiträge: 2133
|
|
| Driver "fglrx" looks o.k., but according to infobash the onboard graphics chip is active:
Zitat:
Videocard Intel 82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE Chipset Integrated Graphics Device X.Org 7.1.0 [ 1024x768 @85hz ]
Are you sure you attached the monitor to the right video connector? You should also re-check the BIOS settings; the Intel chip is clearly not disabled. |
_________________
And I ain't got no worries 'cause I ain't in no hurry at all (Doobie Brothers, "Black Water").
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 04.10.2006, 15:52 Uhr
|
|
Team Member
Anmeldung: 03. Mai 2005
Beiträge: 1544
Wohnort: out there somewhere
|
|
I also agree with ockham23 and I think I asked you this in irc
my crappy FPS with a ATI all-in-wonder 9800 pro
27164 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5432.739 FPS
27153 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5430.520 FPS
27159 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5431.610 FPS
27169 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5433.678 FPS
27138 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5427.551 FPS |
_________________
h2's d-u script
h2's rdiff-backup script
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 04.10.2006, 22:41 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 03. Okt 2006
Beiträge: 8
Wohnort: Buchanan,MI
|
|
|
piper hat folgendes geschrieben::
I also agree with ockham23 and I think I asked you this in irc
my crappy FPS with a ATI all-in-wonder 9800 pro
27164 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5432.739 FPS
27153 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5430.520 FPS
27159 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5431.610 FPS
27169 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5433.678 FPS
27138 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5427.551 FPS
thats alot better than what I get... |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 04.10.2006, 23:07 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 03. Okt 2006
Beiträge: 8
Wohnort: Buchanan,MI
|
|
|
CaneMstr hat folgendes geschrieben::
piper hat folgendes geschrieben::
To be honest, I think your "bad" FPS rate is due to this
Intel Celeron 128
Not the videocard
You know, you might be right...... I have an older one around here, my pop that in, and see if there is any changes.... Thanks for the information.
Hi... I have done some further testing... this is with a differet processor that has a 256 cache.... I will do a infobash....
Host/Kernel/OS "KanotixBox" running Linux 2.6.18-slh-up-2 i686 [ KANOTIX 2006-0 1 ]
CPU Info Intel Celeron 256 KB cache flags( - ) clocked at [ 2666.959 MHz ]
Videocard Intel 82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE Chipset Integrated Graphics Devi ce X.Org 7.1.0 [ 1280x1024 @60hz ]
ATI RV280 [Radeon 9200 SE]
Network cards Intel 82801DB PRO/100 VE (LOM) Ethernet Controller, at port: dc0 0
Processes 72 | Uptime 6min | Memory 276.195/367.289MB | HDD WDC WD1600JB-00GVA0 Size 160GB (2%used) | GLX Renderer RADEON 9250/9200 Series DDR Generic | GLX Ver sion 1.3.1091 (X4.3.0-8.28. | Client Shell | Infobash v2.50rc21
I am open for more suggestions...  next I am going to try to get a nvida card, and try that. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 05.10.2006, 01:36 Uhr
|
|
Team Member
Anmeldung: 03. Mai 2005
Beiträge: 1544
Wohnort: out there somewhere
|
|
Hmm, it's still showing 2 video cards, are you sure you disabled onboard video ?
Is your onboard video AGP or PCI-e ?
CaneMstr hat folgendes geschrieben::
my Radeon card is PCI not AGP.
Are you sure about this ?
I am assuming your ATI is AGP (built in 2004) ?
"If" your onboard video is PCI-e
Make sure it is disabled in the bios and there should be a setting also that gives you a setting to boot from AGP or PCI, should be called init something or another, it's been awhile, I forgot.
If this is a PCI I would maybe guess PCI and not PCI-e, I could be very wrong in all this. |
_________________
h2's d-u script
h2's rdiff-backup script
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 05.10.2006, 03:59 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 03. Okt 2006
Beiträge: 8
Wohnort: Buchanan,MI
|
|
The only option in Bios as far as video goes is Onboard or PCI. I have it set to pci. If I dont you get no screen at all. The Radeon is PCI, and the Intel is AGP.... and it is on the motherboard. I dont see no other options to disable it. No matter what distro I try, it always shows to video cards.
piper hat folgendes geschrieben::
Hmm, it's still showing 2 video cards, are you sure you disabled onboard video ?
Is your onboard video AGP or PCI-e ?
CaneMstr hat folgendes geschrieben::
my Radeon card is PCI not AGP.
Are you sure about this ?
I am assuming your ATI is AGP (built in 2004) ?
"If" your onboard video is PCI-e
Make sure it is disabled in the bios and there should be a setting also that gives you a setting to boot from AGP or PCI, should be called init something or another, it's been awhile, I forgot.
If this is a PCI I would maybe guess PCI and not PCI-e, I could be very wrong in all this.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 05.10.2006, 04:56 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 17. Dez 2003
Beiträge: 16792
|
|
| glxgears values are low with fglrx 8.28.8 and 8.29.6. That's normal. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
