| Autor |
Nachricht |
|
|
Titel: xorg 1:7.1.0-6 [Y]
 Verfasst am: 07.11.2006, 07:17 Uhr
|
|
Team Member
Anmeldung: 23. Dez 2003
Beiträge: 109
|
|
Xorg is updating, inc a new x11-common
When [or IF] asked, hit 'Y''
Code:
*** x11-common (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ?
Y [enter]
its a trivial , 'Y' is best, 'N' willdo |
_________________
namu amida butsu
Zuletzt bearbeitet von etorix am 07.11.2006, 09:37 Uhr, insgesamt ein Mal bearbeitet
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 07.11.2006, 07:49 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 03. Jul 2004
Beiträge: 525
|
|
Any reason why I wouldn't have been asked the question?
Everything seems to have updated OK.
drb |
_________________
Kernel 2.6.21-slh-up-7
_____________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 07.11.2006, 08:26 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 12. Mar 2005
Beiträge: 1005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 07.11.2006, 14:32 Uhr
|
|
Team Member
Anmeldung: 03. Mai 2005
Beiträge: 1544
Wohnort: out there somewhere
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 07.11.2006, 14:38 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 22. Jan 2006
Beiträge: 1296
Wohnort: Budapest
|
|
On three boxes I saw it once.
hubi |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 07.11.2006, 15:03 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 03. Okt 2006
Beiträge: 415
Wohnort: Berlin
|
|
Well, I saw the question on early morning but said no. Am I doomed now?  |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 07.11.2006, 15:09 Uhr
|
|
Team Member
Anmeldung: 03. Mai 2005
Beiträge: 1544
Wohnort: out there somewhere
|
|
|
Crest hat folgendes geschrieben::
Well, I saw the question on early morning but said no. Am I doomed now?
Code:
<<We are Xorg - resistance is futile - you will be axximilated>>
 |
_________________
h2's d-u script
h2's rdiff-backup script
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 07.11.2006, 18:57 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 03. Okt 2006
Beiträge: 415
Wohnort: Berlin
|
|
etorix:
Can you just post the content of the 'new' x11-common? Shouldn't be to hard to see the difference with my old (2006-1 RC3) version. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 08.11.2006, 10:58 Uhr
|
|
Team Member
Anmeldung: 23. Dez 2003
Beiträge: 109
|
|
--- /etc/X11/Xresources/x11-common 2005-07-09 21:21:07.000000000 -0400
+++ /etc/X11/Xresources/x11-common.dpkg-new 2006-10-31 21:34:01.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-! $Id: x11-common 305 2005-07-03 18:51:43Z dnusinow $
+! $Id: x11-common 3893 2006-10-23 23:11:50Z julien $
! load color-specific resources for clients that have them
#ifdef COLOR |
_________________
namu amida butsu
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 08.11.2006, 11:14 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 03. Jul 2004
Beiträge: 525
|
|
Mine, which upgraded but didn't ask the question reads :
Code:
! $Id: x11-common 3893 2006-10-23 23:11:50Z julien $
! load color-specific resources for clients that have them
#ifdef COLOR
*customization: -color
#endif
! make Xaw (Athena widget set) clients understand the delete key
! this causes problems with some non-Xaw apps, use with care
! *Text.translations: #override ~Shift ~Meta <Key>Delete: delete-next-character()
Why the difference?
drb |
_________________
Kernel 2.6.21-slh-up-7
_____________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 08.11.2006, 11:23 Uhr
|
|
Team Member
Anmeldung: 23. Dez 2003
Beiträge: 109
|
|
that was 'D' in vi
this is now installed:
Code:
! $Id: x11-common 305 2005-07-03 18:51:43Z dnusinow $
! load color-specific resources for clients that have them
#ifdef COLOR
*customization: -color
#endif
! make Xaw (Athena widget set) clients understand the delete key
! this causes problems with some non-Xaw apps, use with care
! *Text.translations: #override ~Shift ~Meta <Key>Delete: delete-next-character()
kinda TRIVIAL |
_________________
namu amida butsu
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
