| Autor |
Nachricht |
|
|
Titel: Is etch really sid?
 Verfasst am: 24.09.2006, 00:03 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 07. Jun 2006
Beiträge: 31
Wohnort: planet earth
|
|
| Is etch actually sid? I have done a Etch drive set up with a full current dist-upgrade,to most current Etch..Also the same with sid on a seprate drive.. I see very little to no diffrent from a user view..In other word's you have to literly split hair's to see any diff in operation. Since file access is in the order of micro sec or less time a average human just wont see a diff. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Titel: RE: Is etch really sid?
Verfasst am: 24.09.2006, 00:16 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 13. Mai 2005
Beiträge: 732
Wohnort: Texas
|
|
| I find sid more complete |
_________________
Always acknowledge a fault. This will throw those in authority off their guard and give you an opportunity to commit more.
Mark Twain
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: RE: Is etch really sid?
Verfasst am: 24.09.2006, 03:05 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 08. Dez 2005
Beiträge: 300
|
|
| Sid has more packages than Etch at the moment...but once Etch becomes the new Stable, then more packages would be made for it. Sid, may still remain the unstable branch I believe |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: RE: Is etch really sid?
Verfasst am: 24.09.2006, 04:09 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 13. Mai 2005
Beiträge: 732
Wohnort: Texas
|
|
sid is always the unstable branch.
and sid will almost always have more package made for it since that is where they go first. |
_________________
Always acknowledge a fault. This will throw those in authority off their guard and give you an opportunity to commit more.
Mark Twain
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
