| Autor |
Nachricht |
|
|
Titel: flash 9 now in sid, as flashplugin-nonfree
 Verfasst am: 11.11.2006, 05:47 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 12. Mar 2005
Beiträge: 1005
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Titel: RE: flash 9 now in sid, as flashplugin-nonfree
Verfasst am: 11.11.2006, 15:14 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 01. Feb 2006
Beiträge: 37
Wohnort: Summerville, SC
|
|
| As a note, I had problems with my FF locking up on certain sites and it was flash related. If you have this problem, installing the adblock extension for FF will solve it, as it did for me. I think it has something to do with poorly optimized flash ads, but I am not totally certain. Plus, you will never again be tempted to "HIT THE MONKEY FOR FREE IPOD!!!!11" |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: RE: flash 9 now in sid, as flashplugin-nonfree
Verfasst am: 11.11.2006, 17:07 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 29. Mar 2005
Beiträge: 96
Wohnort: Terra
|
|
If you did go with the Beta you have to remove it from :
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
/usr/lib/firefox/plugins
/usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/plugins
before you can upgrade using the package that is now in Sid. At least those were the directories I had to delete it from before I could get the upgrade to go through.
I use NoScript to block flash along with Stylish to block most ads, seems to work as well or better than messing with Adblock. |
_________________
Easter Rc4 IceWeasel 2.6.18.3-slh-up-1
How to Learn and Use GNU/Linux
My Debian sources.list
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 11.11.2006, 20:22 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 03. Jul 2004
Beiträge: 525
|
|
I manually added the plugin a few weeks ago to each of the plugin folders. The latest d-u has just overwritten the three plugins with no manual removal.
drb |
_________________
Kernel 2.6.21-slh-up-7
_____________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 12.11.2006, 00:37 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 07. Dez 2005
Beiträge: 369
Wohnort: Port Angeles, Wa. USA
|
|
What is the name of the file?
Is it in the **censored** repos?
I did search & show with apt-cache but couldn't find it |
_________________
illegitimati non carborundum
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 12.11.2006, 02:04 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 16. Apr 2006
Beiträge: 207
Wohnort: England
|
|
Since I upgraded to flash (from the repo) the sound in flash has gone out of synch.
With the previous version it was ok.
I have also noticed this when I installed flash 9 on fedora 6. |
_________________
sidux 32 & 64 | PCLinuxOS | PC-BSD
repository of shame - compiz fusion & beryl repo for debian Sid/Lenny/Etch | 32-bit | 64-bit
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 12.11.2006, 03:57 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 08. Dez 2005
Beiträge: 300
|
|
| the one in repo works for me...no loss of synch. Sure you cleared out the old flash 7 out of all plugin folders? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 12.11.2006, 04:24 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 02. Mai 2004
Beiträge: 471
Wohnort: Portland, OR, USA
|
|
|
2radical hat folgendes geschrieben::
What is the name of the file?
Is it in the **censored** repos?
I did search & show with apt-cache but couldn't find it
As h2's title says, it's flashplugin-nonfree. It's in the regular repositories, "contrib" section. The debian package doesn't actually include the flash binary ("libflashplayer.so"), but includes code that downloads and installs it for you. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 12.11.2006, 05:02 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 16. Apr 2006
Beiträge: 207
Wohnort: England
|
|
|
DeepDayze hat folgendes geschrieben::
the one in repo works for me...no loss of synch. Sure you cleared out the old flash 7 out of all plugin folders?
Yeah and I've uninstalled it, deleted the folder and re-installed and it's the same.
I'm generally using firefox 1.5.0.7 but I also have firefox 2 and it's the same with that. |
_________________
sidux 32 & 64 | PCLinuxOS | PC-BSD
repository of shame - compiz fusion & beryl repo for debian Sid/Lenny/Etch | 32-bit | 64-bit
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 12.11.2006, 07:33 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 07. Dez 2005
Beiträge: 369
Wohnort: Port Angeles, Wa. USA
|
|
|
Zitat:
As h2's title says, it's flashplugin-nonfree.
Ohh--er--ahh (no good excuse here) 
I guess I got confused about macromedia > adobe anyway
thanks |
_________________
illegitimati non carborundum
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
