| Autor |
Nachricht |
|
|
Titel: Install 2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 without simbolic links
 Verfasst am: 24.08.2006, 23:17 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 18. Jul 2005
Beiträge: 293
Wohnort: EST US
|
|
Is there a reason why when I run install-kernel-kanotix.sh the simbolic links weren't created? I had to manually create them with
Code:
cd /boot
ln -s initrd.img-2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 initrd.img
ln -s vmlinuz-2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 vmlinuz
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Titel: RE: Install 2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 without simbolic links
Verfasst am: 24.08.2006, 23:48 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 09. Aug 2004
Beiträge: 121
Wohnort: Brisbane Australia
|
|
| And related to this - what is the difference between kernel-2.6.17.11-kanotix-2.zip and kernel-2.6.17.11-slh-up-1.zip which are both listed as "Stable Kernels". Which one is advised to use? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: RE: Install 2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 without simbolic links
Verfasst am: 25.08.2006, 00:24 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 20. Okt 2005
Beiträge: 278
|
|
up stands for uniprocessor.
the kanotix kernel is an smp-enabled kernel.
-Crust |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: RE: Install 2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 without simbolic links
Verfasst am: 25.08.2006, 00:42 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 17. Dez 2003
Beiträge: 16792
|
|
| I removed those symlinks. They are usally not needed. Just a little cleanup. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: RE: Install 2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 without simbolic links
Verfasst am: 25.08.2006, 02:08 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 22. Jan 2006
Beiträge: 1296
Wohnort: Budapest
|
|
I like that cleanup. No double listing of kernels in grub is fine.
hubi |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: Re: RE: Install 2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 without simbolic links
Verfasst am: 25.08.2006, 06:04 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 09. Aug 2004
Beiträge: 121
Wohnort: Brisbane Australia
|
|
|
Crust hat folgendes geschrieben::
up stands for uniprocessor.
the kanotix kernel is an smp-enabled kernel.
So which one is the recommended latest stable kernel for a up machine? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: RE: Re: RE: Install 2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 without simbolic lin
Verfasst am: 25.08.2006, 22:56 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 20. Okt 2005
Beiträge: 278
|
|
I use the up one because the smp ones have bugs on all of my Athlon 64 processors (running in 32 bit mode).
I would suggest the up kernel.
-Crust |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: RE: Re: RE: Install 2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 without simbolic lin
Verfasst am: 26.08.2006, 00:43 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 17. Dez 2003
Beiträge: 16792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: Re: RE: Re: RE: Install 2.6.17.11-kanotix-2 without simbolic
Verfasst am: 26.08.2006, 01:01 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 09. Aug 2004
Beiträge: 121
Wohnort: Brisbane Australia
|
|
|
Crust hat folgendes geschrieben::
I use the up one because the smp ones have bugs on all of my Athlon 64 processors (running in 32 bit mode).
I would suggest the up kernel.
But given that kernel-2.6.17.11-kanotix-2.zip seems to be the "official" kernel release by Kano, and does not bother to state "smp" in it's title so that must not be a significant fact, then should it be the kernel chosen by somebody who just wants to follow the official kanotix release? I only have a up pentium 4 but I note that the kernel on the 2006-RC4 live CD is SMP enabled. Seems that is the preferred one? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
